- Length: 4000 words, (which is roughly 12 type-written, double-space, 1" margin,
Times New Roman, 11 point font, pages of text). This includes the title page and bibliography. NOTE:
We COUNT the words so make sure you have enough (in Microsoft Word, go to Tools-->Wordcount, also the
online submission program will tell you the word count we use.)
-
Stapled in upper, left-hand corner
-
First pages of your paper must be the "Term Paper
Evaluation Sheet" with your name, SSN, and grove username filled out.
-
Next page must be your title page.
-
Start numbering pages with your first complete page of text (the one after
the title page)
TITLE PAGE
The term paper must have a title page consisting of the following:
-
Title (see below)
-
Author's Name
-
UFID
-
Date
-
Course name and number
-
Section Number
Your proposed title MUST BE in the form as one of the sample topics provided in the
Term Paper guide. From inspection one can see that the title is in the
form of a question that clearly indicates the subject being treated. This
question must be a debatable one, in that it presents a debate or controversy
within the topic and asks a question that could satisfactorily be argued
on either side.
Do not use the topic questions exactly as they are written in the Term Paper Guide. Use them as an example of what your own topic should be like.
Any one item missing from the title page may affect
your grade for the third Basic Requirement (See the Evaluation
Sheet).
BODY
The actual term paper text must have the following sections
contained within it. In addition, each section must be labeled within the
paper.
-
I. Thesis
-
II. Introduction
-
III. Discussion of Research
-
IV. Conclusion
-
V. Bibliography
I. Thesis
The thesis of a paper is the paper's raison d'etre, or "reason
to be". Therefore, your thesis should be a statement of the topic being
addressed, the controversy within the topic being presented, and an exact
expression the goal of the paper. The reader should be able to discern
what the paper will be about given the thesis and which side of the issue
you have taken. The paper will be read and graded with respect to its goals.
The thesis is a brief summary of your paper written
in your words. It should contain neither citations nor quotations.
The "goal" described in the thesis is not to explain
both sides of the topic. It is to show that one side of the issue is more
correct than the other. You must choose a side and state in the thesis.
Be very careful when writing the thesis. It is worth
14 (9 + 5 quality) of the paper's 100 total points.
II. Introduction
Here is where you must present some sort of hint as to the
direction of your paper, how you will go about proving your thesis, and
possibly (though not necessarily) an idea of which side of the conflagration
the author will be advocating. The actual topic being discussed, as well
as an explanation of the debate being addressed and its importance, should
be presented. In addition, a general description of the arguments for one
side - and then the other - should be cited to show that the paper is indeed
addressing a real-life, debatable, non-trivial social concern. One or two
examples of actual cases that have occurred in the real world (either for
or against the thesis) can also be presented.
Important: Do not ignore this section of the term
paper. The paper as a whole is meant to show that you have :
-
analyzed how computers are being used in modern society
-
found an area in which there are both positive and negative
results from the use of computers
-
conducted a thorough research into the pros and cons, as
well as examples and real-world incidents, on both sides
-
correctly and convincingly compared and argued the possibilities
and come to a logical conclusion as to the correct path to follow.
An inability to compose an introduction that presents all
the material above may indicate that you have failed to address a topic
in a way necessary to produce an acceptable paper. In general, this may
lead to an obscure, unstructured, and confused term paper that does not
make any clear argument and fails to reach a logical conclusion based on
relevant evidence. This in turn would result in a less than satisfactory
evaluation of the term paper.
This section is worth 9 of the paper's 100 points.
III. Discussion of Research
It is this section that will comprise the bulk of the term
paper. Here is where you would present the actual research and analysis
you have performed. You must clearly present all sides of the issue being
discussed, and convincingly evaluate and argue each side, offering both
evidence and examples of your claims. This section should at a minimum
include the following:
-
Detailed description of the debate and current views of it,
including at least eight (8) different citations of those authorities within
the field who hold these views (see bibliography guide).
-
Explanation of the positive and negative effects of the issue
on society, as well as examples of these effects.
-
An organized structure of description and evaluation so that
the debate is clearly explained and convincingly argued.
-
Valid argument in support of one view along with reasonable
refutation of opposing views.
Anything else in the way of information (such as statistics)
or arguments that help to expound on the nature of the controversy being
addressed should also be included. However, be sure to adhere to the particular
topic in your writing. Presenting information that strays off the topic,
or that does not address the debatable aspects of the subject is detrimental
to your overall argument, and will result in a lowered score. Be sure you
are accurately and completely addressing the topic as it appears in your
approved topic sheet. Papers addressing un-approved topics will
not be graded, and you will not be allowed to submit another.
As a side note, how convincing your overall argument is
can be significantly affected by the paper's quality of grammar and spelling.
Poor spelling, incorrect usage of words, and awkward sentences are not
only comical, but suggest incompetence and incorrectness of thought, both
of which lead to disbelief in an argument on the part of the reader. Try
to ensure that you are saying what you want to say in a paper, and that
any reader can easily understand your argument. The use of ten-dollar words
can be a detriment when used incorrectly and in such a way that your ignorance
is readily apparent.
This section accounts for 20 (10 + 2*5 quality points) of the paper's 100
points.
IV. Conclusion
You should present here a summary of the arguments you have
made, as well as your final statement as to the solution to the debate
and the proper "side" to take. Describe briefly (do not go into a lengthy
re-hash) how the evidence, examples, and arguments previously presented
work to support this final claim.
Back in the history of the United States, in the very
beginnings of Congress, statesmen would passionately argue issues and laws
in an attempt to justly shape the future of the nation. There were, however,
those senators and congressmen that would merely walk on both sides of
a controversy and never come down on one side or the other. These fence-straddlers
came to be known as mugwumps. Do NOT Mugwump. Clearly state your conclusion
by choosing a side of the debate that you have supported with argument
and evidence. You may present an analysis and criticism of existing views,
and even come up with a new one, but you must make a decision. It is of
course, quite possible that someone could just as easily argue the opposing
view of the topic. However, the idea of the term paper is that you have
performed enough research, and have adequately addressed and refuted the
opposing view so that your conclusion is not just simply "your opinion",
but in fact is the reasonable choice derived from logical analysis. In
truth, if the topic addressed by the term paper is one in which there is
a concrete answer, then the term paper has been incorrectly written and
has addressed an unacceptable topic.
V. Bibliography
The paper must contain a bibliography at the end. See the
bibliography guide for specific instructions concerning
how to write the bibliography and the method you are to use to cite sources within the paper.
You must adhere to MLA format for both the bibliography page and the
parenthetical citations.
In general your bibliography should do the following:
- Start on a new page.
- Have the word Bibliography centered and at the top.
- Have at least 8 sources
- Be alphabetized
- Contain a variety of sources from different types and titles
of sources
- Reflect research into a wide range of areas (not just "Time"
magazine)
- Contain recent sources(the majority should be less than three
years old)
- Only contain entries that are cited within the text (and you
should only cite those listed in the bibliography)
You must cite all new evidence as well as every quotation. All evidence that can
not be considered "common knowledge" must be cited. If you have any questions, come see
a TA
Your research can affect research points as well as
any credit given for persuasiveness and bibliography.
Margins, Paragraph Spacing, Fonts, and Other Graphical Items
Your paper should have 1 inch margins
on all sides. Note that on some word processing programs the default
margin setting is 1.2 inches. Be sure to adjust the default accordingly.
No additional lines should be skipped between paragraphs,
and the first line of the paragraph is indented one tab space (roughly
5 spaces).
Many word processing programs and printers allow the user
to choose from many fonts (print styles) and font sizes. Some fonts can
be attractive and add life to a paper; however, some fonts are far too
fancy and make the paper difficult to read. If you have the ability to
choose a font, please choose one that is readable. Times New Roman and
Universal are common and easy to read fonts.
Font size allows the user to adjust
the amount of text there is on a page. Sizes that are too big require more
space, and sizes that are too small are hard to read. If you have the option,
please choose a font size that is between 11pt and 12pt (around the size
of the text on this paper).
Graphical figures can be included in your paper if you
feel that they are required. Since these items are not text, there must
be enough extra text to replace the space that the figures displace.
Clip art can be fun, but it is not appropriate in the
body of a formal paper. If you wish to use it, do so only on the title
page.
Not following the above guidelines can result in a
loss of points related to your ability to follow directions.
Style
Quotes: Quotations are an invaluable tool for research
papers. They allow you to substantiate your ideas with the exact words
of an expert or otherwise knowledgeable person. Following is a list of
rules regarding the use of quotations:
-
Quotations that require 3 lines or fewer should be enclosed
in quotation marks and included in the paragraph in which they are referenced.
-
Quotations that are longer than 3 lines should begin on a
fresh line and the entire quotation should be indented one tab space.
Do not enclose with quotation marks, and the text should only be single-spaced.
-
Since no one else should be summarizing your paper, quotations
are not appropriate in the thesis statement.
-
The quantity of quotations should be limited such that the
bulk of the text is written by the author.
Lists: Lists are seldom necessary in this type of
paper. They should be treated the same as the long quotes (3+ lines) described above,
and each item should be on its own line.
Personal Pronouns: All formal papers should be
written solely in the third person (he, she, it). The only section of the
paper in which you may do otherwise is the conclusion where first person
(I) is allowed. The use of second person (you) should never be used because
you (the writer) would be making assumptions about the reader that may
not be true.
Contractions: Contractions (can't, doesn't, etc.)
are a form of informal speech that should never be used in a formal paper.
Please be aware that it's is a contraction of it is , and
is not acceptable. Its is a possessive pronoun.
Conjecture: We are assuming that you are not an
expert on the topic that you choose to write about. For this reason your
personal opinions, conjecture, or any other forms of editorialization do
not belong in the Discussion of Research section. Your opinions should
be withheld until the conclusion in which they will be backed by evidence
brought up in the Discussion of Research section.
Conversational Wording: The paper should be written
in a formal style. Conversational text is not appropriate. Examples:
-
Well, the reason is .......Well is not appropriate.
-
The answer is, you see ...You see is not appropriate.
-
So, computers are ..........So is not appropriate.
The style items affect multiple areas of the paper.
GRADING PHILOSOPHY
Papers will be graded on a 100-point scale. Factors that
will be considered in the grading will include, but not be limited to:
-
Quality, quantity, & thoroughness of research
-
Adherence to topic
-
Thoroughness of coverage of the topic issues
-
Relevancy and clarity of argument
-
Persuasiveness and accuracy of conclusions
-
Clarity of thesis
-
Novelty of approach
-
Difficulty of subject matter
-
Correctness and quality of works cited
-
Grammar and spelling
-
Adherence to instructions
A good source for ideas on how a term paper will be graded
is the term paper evaluation sheet. Grading criteria as well as associated
points are explicitly described, and you are encouraged use this form to evaluate
your own paper - or have someone else evaluate it - before turning it in.
DUE DATES
You MUST submit both a hardcopy (paper) and complete the online submission program. A
termpaper will not be considered submitted until we have the hardcopy AND you have completed the
online submission program. (Do NOT email your termpaper to us, we can't read it that way). The
paper copy and the electronic copy must contain the same words (for example, don't try to fool the word
count by repeating pages, we consider that cheating).
Students who turn in their papers early will receive extra credit according to the
schedule shown under "TIMELINESS POINTS" on the "Term Paper Evaluation" sheet.
These points can make a considerable difference in your final grade, or may help to offset a
lower-than-expected term paper grade. You must turn your paper in to the Computer and Information
Sciences department office (CSE E301), during regular business hours (8 am to 5 pm)- be sure to obtain a
time stamp from the clerk on duty. Do not slide term papers under anyone's door, as we can not verify
the time at which time the paper was turned in, nor can we ensure that the paper will not be lost. Do
not give your paper to a TA or to the instructor in class.
We will try to post on Webgrades the "date received"
for your paper as soon as possible. We will post the TA grader and grade for your paper as soon as
we can. Please be aware that it often takes us a couple of weeks to grade the term papers. Please
do not send emails like, "Is my paper graded?" as we will post the grade as soon as it is
done.
WARNING: Turning your paper in late (even 1
minute) results in a loss of 25 of the paper's 100 points. This is equivalent to almost a letter grade
(on your semester average). This deadline is final and non-negotiable. Since you know about this paper
from day one last minute problems (computer crashes, sickness, vacations, other tests/projects,
weddings, athletic events, etc) will not give you an extension.
*** WARNINGS ***
- Sometimes computers go down. Sometimes printers can fail. If for some reason these
occurrences cause your paper to be turned in late, you will be assessed late points. You have several
weeks to complete this paper. If something causes problems at the last minute, it's your own problem.
We will, however, be happy to help with problems that happen during the semester, just not at the last
minute.
- Make a "backup" copy of your paper before turning it in, for two reasons. First, WE
DO NOT RETURN PAPERS TO STUDENTS. Once your paper has been graded, however, you are welcome to see
your paper and review the basis of your grade with the TA who graded your paper during their office hours. Second, because of the large number of students enrolled in this
course, infrequently a paper is lost in the shuffle. It is your responsibility to make sure we get your
paper.
- Do not fall into the trap of expecting that a paper which merely follows
these instructions receives an automatic "A". Rather, a paper which merely meets the minimum
standards set forth above is a "C" paper. In order to receive a higher grade, the paper must
distinguish itself as being substantially above these minimum requirements. Generally, this
must be done through earning "quality" points or "timeliness" points as set forth in the term paper evaluation sheet.
- Every effort is made to be fair and consistent in the grading of papers.
As a general rule, we do NOT regrade term papers. If you believe that something significant
was overlooked in the grading of your paper, you may request, in writing, a formal regrade
as set forth elsewhere in this document.
- Do not write about a topic unless it has been approved by a TA or
professor. If in doubt, ask. If you are having a problem coming up with a topic drop by
the office.
TERM PAPER REGRADING POLICY
Guidelines
Initial Review
Any student wishing to review her term paper may come to
the instructor or a teaching assistant. At that time we will discuss the
basis on which the different criteria are judged. We will be able to directly
address the more algorithmic elements of the grade. As much as possible,
we will also address the overall evaluation factors based on the cover
sheet and any comments.
Formal Regrade
The student should then review her term paper in light of
the information presented. If they are not satisfied with the outcome of
the informal review, and instead feels that they satisfied one or more
of the questioned criteria, they may request that a formal regrading be
conducted.
Steps to Perform
In order to request a formal regrade, the student must submit in writing a list of the
specific area in which she believes her grade to be improper. For each area, a description of the
reason why and identification of the portion of the paper that supports the claim must also be
supplied.
EX: If there is a objection to a average score in the persuasiveness of arguments
area, the student must give specific justification of the passage in the paper which demonstrate
"excellence" in that area.
GENERAL REGRADING RESULTS
- Regrades will be performed after all regular grading has been
completed.
- If the regraded paper does not receive a higher score, an additional ten (10)
points will be deducted from the regrade, as a penalty for frivolous complaints.
-
No papers will be regraded after final grades are submitted to the
registrar.
- Regrades are extremely rare, do not depend on having one granted.
Term Paper Topics
It is the responsibility of each student to select a term paper topic early in
the term. The following is a list of sample term paper topics. You should be certain of your
interest in the topic you select, as well as the availability of materials, before you
commit yourself to a particular topic. Do not procrastinate. Toward the end of the term,
there will be a substantial demand on library resources, and materials may become difficult
to find. With this in mind, strive to be considerate of your classmates, keeping library
materials for only as long as necessary and refraining from removing materials from
magazines or books. Your topic must be controversial, current, and related to computers.
Sample topics:
-
Are computer-mediated forms of communication allowing faster,
better communication between humans, or are they the cause of social and
psychological problems that isolate humans from each other and damage traditional
communication?
-
Have computers reduced society's total workload and thereby
made life more enjoyable, or have they instead created work and made life
more stressful?
-
Is the popular media helping to ease society into a new high
tech way of life, or is it helping to build a general "technophobia"?
-
Are software patents and copyrights truly necessary for protection
from piracy and theft, or are they hindering progress and development in
the software industry?
-
Do "dive computers" promote enhanced safety, or do they invite
unjustified, and dangerous, over-reliance on the machine?
-
Should the development (and control) of the National Information Infrastructure (NII) be
regulated by the Federal government, or should it be exclusively controlled by private
industry?
-
Does the recent feeding-frenzy of takeovers and mergers in the communications industry
presage an unacceptable concentration of electronic power?
-
Should hardware and software manufacturers be held financially liable for losses caused
by bugs that were known about prior to the public release of their products?
-
Are the parallels between the Patriot Act (I & II) and George Orwell's "1984"
inescapable?
-
Is the computer age increasing the gap between knowledge "haves" and knowledge "have
nots"?
-
Should internet communication content be subject to federal regulation?
-
Should individuals who download copyrighted music be prosecuted for copyright
violations?
-
Given that computers can be used to alter photographs, should the use of photographs in
criminal cases be prohibited or otherwise strictly limited?
-
Will the proliferation of literature on the internet make copyright laws unenforceable or
meaningless?
-
Does the use of computers in implementing electronic open government improve our
democracy, or does it actually result in discrimination against non-computer users?
-
Has blogging changed American politics?
-
Is a "high degree of reliability" standard acceptable for software used in applications
which pose a risk to human life, or are the error levels and probabilities of these systems
unacceptable for use in society? Are these systems accurate enough to be relied upon?
-
Should colleges be allowed to require student ID cards - magnetically encoded with
personal information - for entrance to dorms and buildings around campus, or does this pose potential
problems in the way of misuse of the information collected?
-
Computer games such as "MUD"s, in which participants create a character for themselves
and act out roles in a real-time, virtual environment, attract worldwide participation. Recently, a
character "sexually assaulted" (in a virtual sense) the characters of other participants. Should there
be limits set for such digital deviance, or should the users be free to express themselves in any way
they feel necessary?
-
Will computers ever be able to produce poetry with emotional impact? If so, what approach
do you foresee being used to create programs to do this? If not, why not?
-
Is the sale of computer mailing lists an invasion of privacy or is it the legitimate
exercise of the capitalist system? Does the information being sold actually belong to the individual
subject, or is it public knowledge, which is the property of the information collecting agency by
virtue of the work performed in collecting it?
-
Should the use of internet be granted without cost to provide access to the public
libraries and research materials available, or should there be user fees imposed to pay for connection
costs and the services available?
-
Does management have the unrestricted right to monitor an employee's use of office
computers, - including the employee's "private" communications on his/her account - in an effort to
optimize productivity?
-
Should the federal Drug Enforcement Agency have the right to decode all encrypted
messages sent by American citizens?
-
Should an employer have the unconditional right to monitor any employee's e-mail sent on
a personal company-issued account?
-
Should your doctor have unrestricted access to your computerized medical records
(including records accrued outside of his/her practice), so long as his/her motivation is to provide
you with better medical services?
-
Will reliance on computers eventually stifle the creativity of graphic
artists?
-
Is the search for computer-based artificial intelligence an appropriate pursuit for
science; that is, is it in the best interest of mankind to build a human machine?
-
The computer has given us the ability to diagnose fetal defects. Is this an appropriate
use of technology?
-
DNA testing presents a statistical probability that a person on trial has in fact
committed the crime. Should such evidence be admissible in court?
-
In criminal cases, rich defendants can afford to use computers to gather dossiers on all
prospective jurors. Should such information gathering be prohibited on the grounds that it creates a
playing field more level for some defendants than for others? Or should a defendant have the right to
all the justice he can afford?
-
Cable television networks and telephone networks are based on completely different
philosophies, as well as governed by completely different rules and regulations. With merging
technology, will their philosophies, rules, and regulations also be forced to merge?
-
The introduction of complex, expensive new technology in medicine will present incredibly
tough choices as to who gets access to these technologies and how we pay for them. Are computers
lending a helping hand in making advanced medical treatments available, or are they causing problems of
their own in creating gaps between socio-economic groups?
-
Hyperintelligence - a dramatic expansion of the power of the brain - is made possible by
global computer networks. Will Hyperintelligence help to create a new and better global society, or
will it result in a new, priesthood?
-
With a sufficiently human-like appearance, the "super-robot" might become a sexual
surrogate? Does this pose unacceptable possibilities for abuse, such as enslavement, and the necessity
for "robot-abuse" clinics (just as we have drug/sexual abuse clinics)?
-
Should there be limits to the connection between computers and the human body? Are
bio-implants a violation of privacy?
-
Is the "information revolution" a new phenomenon or do past revolutions provide clues as
to what a total "information society" might look like?
-
Is technology broadening or narrowing the generation gap?
-
Does high technology make religion irrelevant?
-
Is there a world-wide conspiracy which is using technology to concentrate power in the
hands of a few people?
-
Could Europe use technology to become a superpower, supplanting the United
States?
-
Does technology free us to explore our cultural diversity, or does it rob us of our
heritage by forcing us to adopt a new, generic culture?
-
Since multimedia will make it possible for people to conference from home, do you predict
that humans will eventually not go to offices at all but work at home instead? If so, what sorts of
problems might this create?
-
The Human Genome Project is a multibillion dollar effort to analyze the entire human
genetic system. The project has already helped scientists identify genetic cause of some diseases. Will
this project ultimately benefit humanity or is it instead an unconscionable threat to
privacy?
-
Should the use of computers be prohibited as used by large stock traders to trigger sell
or buy orders?
-
Do the system operators of electronic bulletin boards have the right to censor obscene
messages or would such censorship be a violation of freedom of speech?
-
What should be the "community" used to determine a "community standard" in a test for
bulletin board pornography?
-
Should government or industry use technology to track the behavior of every American
citizen?
-
Assuming a need for heightened security from terrorist attacks, how much intrusion into
personal affairs should the Government be allowed in order to protect us?
-
Is the Bush "Total Information Acquisition" program justified?
These are merely samples to assist you in formulating your own topic, you do not have to
write on these topics. This paper is wide open, past topics have involved economics, art,
education, and many other areas. Check the topics page for
instructions on how to submit your topic.