PSY 4604 History of Psychology
Fall,
2004 Dr. Dewsbury
M,
W, F Period 2 http://grove.ufl.edu/~dewsbury/
Room 130 Psychology
3 Credits
Dewsbury@ufl.edu
SYLLABUS
_________________________________________________________________
TEXTS: Goodwin, C. J. (2005). A history of
modern psychology. (2nd Edition) New York: Wiley.
Supplementary readings.
_________________________________________________________________
READING
ASSIGNMENTS AND A TENTATIVE SCHEDULE are provided on the last page.
EXAM
DATES: Friday, October 1; Friday, November 5; Monday, December 13, 10:00
A,M.-12:00 Noon(13B)
_________________________________________________________________
Course Objectives and
Philosophy
I believe that the course in the history of
psychology can be the most important course in the undergraduate program. It is only here that we begin to see and
understand the evolution of this complex discipline called psychology. I want the student to locate him- or herself
in that history in order to understand the intellectual environment in which
they exist and to see the assumptions underlying contemporary approaches. Other sets of assumptions might lead to
different approaches.
My hopes are to a.) provide a survey of
many of the major events and movements in the history of psychology b.)
illustrate some of the problems one encounters in doing history, c.)
demonstrate some problematic bases of much of our knowledge, and d.) provide
hands-on experience in working with available materials for research in the
field.
Some Organizational
Considerations
Recently, I have used Goodwin’s A
History of Modern Psychology as the textbook for the course. It has worked well though, like all
textbooks, it has its flaws. I think it reads well and is reasonably complete,
but it is not as overwhelming as some alternatives. The second edition of this
book has just appeared recently and I will be using it for the first time. Parts of it will be as new to me as they are
to you. The supplemental readings help
in areas not covered by Goodwin.
Exam formats are a key problem. I think that we need them and I have
scheduled 3 exams, including the final. I have tried numerous formats and
settled on one. We will have
short-essay tests. By that, I mean that
exams will have straight-forward questions that can be answered in a few
written sentences with 3 questions per page. For example,
What is the main difference between an epistemology
based on empiricism vs. rationalism?
What was the importance of the “Termanites” (or
“Termites”)?
I
will make an effort to ask questions, at least some of which focus more on
understanding than on memorization. I
encourage you to submit questions for possible use on the exams. My plan is to give 17 7-point questions, of
which you will need to answer 14, plus one mandatory 2-point question. We will go over the exams when I return
them, generally in the next class after the exam, but I will retain the
exams. You are welcome to re-examine
them in my office.
In extreme cases and where there is good cause and it is
cleared with me in advance, make-up exams will be permissible when absence
during an exam is unavoidable. These will
be constructed entirely of identification and short essay questions and should
be taken as soon as possible after the date of the regularly scheduled class
exam.
Coverage
and Reading Assignments.
Authorities disagree about what should be
covered in courses in the history of psychology. Some instructors begin with the ancient Greeks and spend much of
the course on the period prior to the development of experimental
psychology. Others begin with Wundt at
around 1879 and ignore pre-experimental thought related to psychology. Goodwin offers a compromise. I too would like to provide an intermediate
approach, covering the earlier period but emphasizing the more recent
developments. My hope is to provide the
background that you need but to spend more of our time on topics of direct
relevance to psychology as a discipline.
I think this will result in a useful course and in good coverage. However, this can make for an unevenness in
the reading assignments with respect to both the area covered and the
timing. For that reason, I have added
the supplementary readings.
Because I continue to tinker with the
course in an effort to improve it, the schedule that I provide at the end of
this syllabus is only approximate. I
will deviate from it where it seems appropriate. I have included five periods near the end of the course to cover
“Fields of Psychology.” This is to
allow some flexibility in coverage. If
most of the class is interested in a particular part of psychology, such as
cognitive or social psychology, I will try to provide coverage. I also have some videotapes that would fit
well at this point in the course. This
provides some opportunity for you to have a say in this part of the course and
for me to try to make it maximally meaningful for you.
Supplementary
Readings.
I have chosen several articles that help to
fill in in the content in some areas.
You will find these a bit more difficult than the textbook; they were
written for psychologists rather than undergraduates. However, they were written for a general psychological audience
and I think that you will understand most of them. Don't worry if you find some parts difficult. These articles will be available on-line.
There are several ways in which you might
access these articles.
First, you could go to the library and read
hard copy. This will not work if you
all try to do it at once. The other,
preferred, approaches require on-line access to the university library. If you have a GatorLink account and Acrobat
reader, which can be downloaded free of cost, on your computer, you should be
able to get the readings on-line. I can
access these materials from my home computer, as can many students. However,
some students find that they need to use a computer in the library.
There may be minor variations in how this
works but this worked for me as of August, 2004:
1. From a university-linked site with an
Acrobat reader, dial up to the UF library electronic journal site: http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/ej/.
2. Type in the name of the journal
containing the article you wish to access (American Psychologist).
3. Click on “APA PsychArticles.”
4. Click on the volume number you want.
5. Click on the issue number you want.
6. Find the article that you want in the
Table of Contents.
7. Click “View Article” in the format you
prefer.
The assigned articles follow. Both the volume and issue numbers are given
to help you find them.
September 24: Benjamin, L.
T., Jr. (2000). The psychology laboratory at the turn of the 20th
century. American Psychologist, 55 (3), 318-321.
September 29: Evans, R.
(2000). Psychological instruments at the turn of the century. American Psychologist, 55 (3),
322-325.
October 18: Taylor, E.
(2000). Psychotherapeutics and the problematic origins of clinical psychology
in America. American Psychologist,
55 (9), 1029-1033.
November 10: Humphreys, K.
(1996). Clinical psychologists as psychotherapists: History, future, and
alternatives. American Psychologist,
51 (3). 190-197.
November 15: Riger, S.
(1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and
the study of women. American
Psychologist, 47 (6), 730-740.
November 15: Milar, K. S.
(2000). The first generation of women psychologists and the psychology of
women. American Psychologist, 55
(6), 616-619.
November 17: Minton, H. L.
(2000). Psychology and gender at the turn of the century. American Psychologist, 55 (6),
613-615.
November 22: Lal, S. (2002).
Giving children security: Mamie Phipps Clark and the racialization of child
psychology. American Psychologist,
57 (1), 20-28.
November 29: Leahey, T. H.
(1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47 (2),
308-318.
December 1: Morawski, J. G.
(2000). Social psychology a century ago.
American Psychologist, 55 (4), 427-430.
Paper.
I
would like to have you write papers.
One of the benefits from a course in the history of psychology should be
to get you to use primary source materials of historical interest and to learn
how to find them. These skills can be
honed with a paper.
There are many possible topics. Most of you will probably write about an
individual psychologist. Generally,
this should be an individual who is deceased.
You should prepare a critical discussion of his or her life and
work. You will probably want to use
some space for biographical material.
However, the major emphasis should be on the person's work. As this is a course in the history of
psychology, some cognizance of historical context should be provided. It should be clear why the person was
important to psychology. You should be
critical. You should be able to
evaluate the person's work, its strengths, and its weaknesses. If you choose a person about whom much has
been written (e.g., Freud, James, Darwin), you will need to focus on one or a
few aspects of the person's work. For
others, it may be a challenge to piece together enough to make a paper.
Some of you may wish to write on a
particular topic in the history of psychology rather than to emphasize a single
person. This is fine; indeed, I
encourage it. In general, it may be a
bit more difficult and risky, but can lead to a very fine paper-- often the best
in the class.
Be sure that you do not simply rehash
material from the rest of the course.
Many of you will wish to write about a psychologist or problem that will
be covered during the last part of the course.
These are the more recent individuals and those most closely related to
current sub-fields. Feel free to read
ahead to select such an individual, even if we will not touch on them in the
course. If you have an interest in a
particular area (e.g., social psychology, physiological psychology, women, minorities) you may wish to consult an
instructor, a specialty text, or me for ideas.
I have a list and tally of the previous papers submitted since I have
been teaching the courses in the history of psychology (Horney, Maslow, and
Piaget are in the lead). Should you
choose a topic, be careful to provide a true historical focus; do not simply
write a literature review of a current topic with old references.
Some tips concerning choice of topic and
style can be found on my web site.
One possibility would be to write a paper
that serves to link what we cover in the course with your major interest in
psychology. You may define your area as
broadly or narrowly as you wish. You
may wish to write about the roots of “clinical psychology” or “Wolpe’s desensitization
approach;” on “behavioral neuroscience,” or “the physiological control of
ingestive behavior.” The idea is to try
to provide a linkage between the core history of psychology, as will be covered
in the course, and the area of interest.
The goals in this kind of paper would be to give you some perspective on
the roots of whatever approach is most meaningful to you as an individual
psychologist and to familiarize you with the literature on the history of the
area that is most meaningful to you.
I encourage you to select a psychologist or
topic that is relevant to your interests.
However, your paper should not be a rehash of a paper written for
another course. You are to create a new
work that will expand your horizons. I
have had a problem with this issue in the past. Above all, I want this to be a meaningful experience for you that
will aid in your development as a psychologist.
Length is not the major consideration; I
anticipate that the mean length will be around 8-12 pages. Many of the best papers are longer, but not
all long papers are good and not all good papers are long. Care in preparation, including spelling,
will be a factor. I prefer that the
paper be stapled, with a cover page, but without a binder of any kind.
I expect you to use the extensive reference
materials available in the library and on-line. Coverage from other textbooks will not suffice. Toward that end we will spend a period near the middle of the course reviewing
some of these resources.
I ask that you turn in your paper in
duplicate so that I can retain a copy.
I wish to protect against plagiarism and to have a source of references
to help future students deal with topics or psychologists with whom I may be
less familiar (Sorry, I don't know them all!).
I strongly encourage you to use APA style (Publication
Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th Ed.). If you wish to use a system other than APA
style, please clear it with me first and indicate it clearly on your
paper. You should know proper formats
by now; if not, consult an appropriate source.
Major facts should be supported with a reference and the reference
system should be used correctly and consistently. Every source that you cite in your paper should be listed in a
reference section or footnote and every source in a reference section should be
cited in text. Please note that the
latest edition (5th) of the APA Publication Manual was published in the summer
of 2001. You can find help using APA
style on the UF Library web site.
I ask that you clear all topics with
me. A brief written proposal should
be turned in no later than October 13.
However, feel free to turn it in earlier and get a good start.
Among the important factors determining a
grade are:
1.
Inclusion of original analyses or opinions of the author-- something new. (A little creativity can be
like a breath of fresh air!)
2.
Demonstration of mastery of library sources.
3.
Proper citation and reference form.
4.
Reasonably good English prose writing style.
Some
common errors in APA style:
1.
Do not right justify.
2.
Provide a title page.
3.
No abstract is required.
4.
Write from an outline.
5.
All references cited in text should be listed in the Reference section and all
references listed should be cited in text.
6.
Be careful to use correct form for books, book chapters, journal articles, and
materials from the web.
7.
Minimize material from the web as it often is unreliable. It is a great source for searching but much
material is unrefereed.
7.
In references for journal article titles, book titles, and chapter titles, only
the first word in the title, the first word following a colon, and proper nouns
are capitalized.
8.
Number pages in APA style.
9.
Provide a running head on the title page.
10.
In text, provide page numbers for all quotations; these are not necessary for
citations that are not quotations.
11.
All in-text citations should include the author(s) and year of
publication. If there are three or more
authors, list all three in the first citation and the senior author, et. al.
thereafter.
12.
Avoid slang (e.g., lab).
13.
Sub-headings can help to structure the paper.
14.
Tell the reader what you are about to write, write it, and tell the reader what
conclusions you draw.
15.
Double-space everything in the paper.
16.
Proof read carefully.
Please note that, out of habit, I mark
grammar and spelling on all materials.
These marks often intimidate students.
They are not the primary factor in determining grades. There is probably a zero correlation between
the amount of red ink on a paper and the grade.
Other Topics
Grades.
The primary bases for grades will be the
three exams and the paper grade. I plan
to weigh each of these equally (25% each).
I use a sliding scale in assigning final
grades. In past years the proportion of
A's, B's, etc. has varied from year to year depending on the performance in the
course. I generally aim for about 25%
A's, 30-35% B's and B+'s, 30-35% C's and C+'s, and 10% D's, D+'s, and E's. I
try to keep 60 as an absolute minimum test score for a grade of C. I prefer not
to give D’s and E’s if possible
However, this is quite flexible.
Sometimes the grade distribution is such that I cannot reach these
targets. I am prepared to give either more A's or D's should performance appear
to merit it. Because I try to treat all
students equally, I do not accept extra credit projects as means of increasing
grades.
To help you get some idea, here is the
breakdown of grades from recent years:
Year Percentage
A B+ B C+ C D
1997 25 18 21
7 25 0
1998 30 7 15 18 18 3
1999 32 9 18 14 23 4
2000 27 9 18 14 32 0
2001 28 4 12
8 40 2
2003 36 11 14 10 7 0
I
have only had to give one “E” during the last six years.
As a further guide, please not the
following. During the period from
1997-2001, the lowest 4-grade averages to earn each final grade was as follows:
A 83.6; B+ 80.3; B 76.2; C+ 71.7; C 62.5.
I realize that this system produces some
ambiguity during the semester. The
alternative is to provide an absolute scale (e.g., A=90; B=80 etc.). This would make it easier for students to
know exactly where they ranked during the semester but would remove the
flexibility of my present system. I
believe it would be less fair than the present system.
Lecture
Outline.
A lecture outline will be available on my
home page on the internet at http://grove.ufl.edu/~dewsbury/. It provides an outline with relevant terms from the lectures. We
will not cover everything in the outline. These are an aid to some of the
important topics covered and should help you to study. It is not all-inclusive, however, and there
will be questions on exams from lecture and/or the readings not in the list of
terms. There are many concepts, for
example, that do not lend themselves to brief summaries in lists of terms.
Links
http://www.psych.yorku.ca/orgs/resource.htm Christopher Green’s web site of links to history-related sites.
http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a.tcl?topic=History%20%26%20Theory%20of%20Psychology Christopher Green's York
University History & Theory of Psychology Electronic Question & Answer
Forum: a very useful Question and Answer page that can be very useful for
students. You may even want to submit a
question. It also can be reached
through the page listed just above.
http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/ Christopher Green’s web site of full-text productions of classics
in the history of psychology
http://www.cwu.edu/~warren/461outline.html Warren’s Street’s lecture
outline for his course at Central Washington University.
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/Mind/Table.html Rob Wozniak’s Mind and Body text.
http://web.uflib.ufl.edu/cm/psych/psych.html UF Library site for resources in psychology. (If this does not work, go to the UF Library
home page and click on “Subject Guides and Specialists.”
http://www3.uakron.edu/ahap/ Home page for the Archives
of the History of American
http://www.psych.yorku.ca/femhop/ Division 35 (Society for
the Psychology of Women) Heritage Site with biographies of some prominent women
in psychology.
Attendance
and Class Participation.
I strongly recommend that you attend
class. I believe that the classes will
be worthwhile and I strongly encourage regular class attendance. I do not plan to take attendance on a daily
basis. However, should lack of
attendance become a problem, I reserve the right to either start taking
attendance or to give unannounced quizzes and to include results as part of the
course grades. I will cover material
not in the book and provide depth on material that is in the book. I think that you will have some difficulties
with the exams if you choose regularly to skip class. I hope that you will choose to attend class regularly. You should note that class attendance will
be even more important during some parts of the course than others.
Finding
Me.
My office is 357 Psychology. My telephone number is 392-0601 x279. I am on campus much of the time and
available most of that time but I will try to keep Monday and Thursday,
1:15-2:15 as formal office hours.
Changes will be announced in class.
I can also be reached by e-mail: dewsbury@ufl.edu.
Some University or College
Policies
Students
Needing Special Accommodations.
According to university policy, “students
requesting classroom accommodation must first register with the Dean of
Students Office. The Dean of Students Office will provide documentation to the
student who must then provide this documentation to the Instructor when
requesting accommodation."
University
Honesty Policy.
The University has an explicit policy on
academic honesty. In essence, (a.)
answers provided on exams should be solely those of the individual student with
no outside help, and (b.) where a paper is required students should avoid
plagiarism by ensuring that any material taken from various sources is
attributed to that source and placed in quotation marks in the material is
quoted verbatim. Please recall the
pledge that you are required to sign a registration each semester:
“I understand that the University of Florida expects
its students to be honest in all of their academic work. I agree to adhere to this commitment to
academic honesty and understand that my failure to comply with this commitment
may result in disciplinary action, up to and including expulsion from the
University.”
Counseling
and Mental Health Services.
Should you require professional help during
the semester, the University Counseling Center can be found in Room P301
Peabody Hall (392-1575) and the Student Mental Health Services is located in
room 245 Infirmary (392-1171, www.hsc.ufl.edu/shcc).
If we do not succeed in convincing you of
the centrality of a course in the history of psychology, I hope that we can at
least create an interesting and meaningful educational experience.
Incomplete
Grades
The "I" grade should not be given
unless the instructor
and
the student have completed an "I" contract (it's available, along
with the "I" policy in the AAC advising manual on our website
--www.advising.ufl.edu -- just click the "Academic Advising Center"
title and type "advisor" and "1001" when asked; then go to
"I" in the index, and you will see the form and the policy).
"I" grades should be given out
only when a student who is passing the course (D or better) can no longer
function to complete the class. The
student and the instructor should meet and agree how and when the student will
make up the work. There must be a
deadline when the "I" grade will change, whether the work is complete
or not. There must be a grade
specified, if the work is not completed per the contract, i.e., "you will
get this grade __ if you don't complete the work described here."
The student should get a copy of the form,
and the instructor should give another copy to the staff person in the main office
who is in charge of grade changes. That
person should review all "I" contracts each semester and change the
grades (for those which have expired) to the "default" grade
specified on the form. That staff
person should also note when a course has been completed satisfactorily (and
the grade changed) and should then remove the "I" contract from the
"live" file
and
give the completed "I" contract back to the instructor, once a grade
change has been submitted to Linda O'Donnell in the AAC.
Further, instructors shouldn't agree to an
"I" contract with a student immediately before, during or after the
final exam, unless a documented emergency has prevented the student from being
able to complete the final exam. Of
course, instructors have some discretion in determining when they will make
this sort of exception; but I would urge you to be strict in this regard. One thing we are trying to prevent with the
"I" contracts are students begging professors to change "D"
and "E" grades
to
"I" grades after the student has legitimately earned a "D"
or "E" grade.
Courtesy in Class.
Disruptions in class can affect both the
instructor and other students. Let’s
try to arrive on time and be courteous to each other. Please do not talk during class, except as part of the normal
interchange that is part of the class, which I encourage. Should you feel an absolute need to study
for another course or to read the Alligator, please do it elsewhere.
Please turn off cell phones before class.
I have a watch and rarely go over the
scheduled end of the class by more than a minute or two. I do not need to be reminded of the
approaching end of the period with closing books, scuffling feet, etc.
A Final Word.
I believe that a course in the history of
psychology can be the most important course in your psychological course
work. Many of you will disagree,
preferring to focus on the latest research results. However, the history course is the one place in our curriculum
where the entire fabric of psychology can be examined. I firmly believe that some breadth of
perspective is necessary if we are to work our way out of the morass or
fragmentation that many believe characterizes contemporary psychology.
|
PSY 4604 FALL, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOPIC |
ASSSIGNED READINGS |
|
LECTURE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Goodwin |
On-line readings |
REFERENCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Goodwin |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Aug. 23 |
Organizational |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Aug. 25 |
Introductory material |
1 |
|
1-7 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
__ |
Aug. 27 |
Historiography |
|
|
7-21 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Aug. 30 |
Historiography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Sep. 01 |
Philosophical Roots |
2 |
|
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
__ |
Sep. 03 |
Philosophical Roots |
|
|
34-49 |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Sep. 06 |
LABOR DAY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Sep. 08 |
Philosophical Roots |
|
|
49-51 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
__ |
Sep. 10 |
Early Physiological |
3 |
|
54-81 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Sep. 13 |
Early Sensory |
4 |
|
84-90 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Sep. 15 |
Wundt |
|
|
90-101 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
__ |
Sep. 17 |
Evolution |
5 |
|
114-125 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Sep. 20 |
Comparative Psychology |
|
|
125-132 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Sep. 22 |
James |
6 |
|
142-159 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
__ |
Sep. 24 |
Turn of the 20th Century |
|
Benjamin |
159-167 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Sep. 27 |
Titchener/Structuralism |
7 |
|
176-188 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Sep. 29 |
Instruments in psychology |
|
Evans |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
__ |
Oct. 01 |
EXAM 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Oct. 04 |
Library Methods |
|
|
188-206 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Oct. 06 |