CBH 6056 Room: Mech. Eng. Aerospace 327
Comparative
Psychology Thursdays,
Periods 9-11
Dr.
Dewsbury
4:05-7:05 P.M.
SYLLABUS
_________________________________________________________________
Textbooks:
Alcock, J. (2001). Animal behavior: An
evolutionary approach (7th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Hauser, M. D. (2000). Wild Minds: What
animals really think. New York: Owl Books/ Henry Holt.
_____________________________________________________________
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
PERIOD DATE GENERAL TOPIC
|
1 |
Aug. 26 |
Organization |
|
2 |
Sep. 02 |
History |
|
3 |
Sep. 09 |
Evolution |
|
4 |
Sep. 16 |
Behavior Genetics |
|
5 |
Sep. 23 |
Development |
|
6 |
Sep. 30 |
Learning |
|
7 |
Oct. 07 |
Individual behavior |
|
8 |
Oct. 14 |
Reproductive behavior |
|
9 |
Oct. 21 |
Social behavior |
|
10 |
Oct. 28 |
Communication |
|
11 |
Nov. 04 |
Cognition I: Language
&Recognition |
|
X |
Nov. 11 |
VETERAN'S DAY |
|
12 |
Nov. 18 |
Cognition II: Problem
Solving |
|
X |
Nov. 25 |
THANKSGIVING |
|
13 |
Dec. 02 |
Cognition III: Mind;Animals & Humans |
____________________________________________________________
GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF COURSE
My goal is to provide a solid, graduate-level introduction to
the field of comparative psychology as it exists today. With just 13 periods, we cannot do a complete
coverage of the field. Rather, the
course will deal with selected major topics.
I plan to treat students as adults and to organize the course as a blend
between lecture and seminar formats.
_________________________________________________________________
FORMAT
I have outlined a proposed format below. I am willing to reconsider specific aspects
of this format if we become unsatisfied with progress and there are good
alternatives proposed.
Because this is an advanced graduate level course, I will try to
run it in an adult fashion. I will ask
you to invest time in reading and thinking about material, rather than writing
papers or studying for tests. If
this is successful, we will have no exams and no papers.
Classes will include a mix of lecture, audio-visual material,
presentation of readings by students, and discussion. The exact mix will vary from class to class, depending on the
topic. Each week all students will read
a core article or articles from the literature plus selected chapters from the
textbooks. In addition, each student
will read one or more articles, depending on length, from the literature
arranged so that typically 1-3 students in the class have read that article,
depending on class size; the ideal number is two. If two or more students are assigned to each reading, there will
be one assigned as a "primary" presenter to present the material to
the class and one or more as "secondary" discussants responsible for
reacting to the presentation and initiating discussion. These latter materials will be covered in a
seminar format with student presentations and extensive discussion.
The week preceding each class I will prepare a list of
individual readings for that class. On
some occasions there will be a set of two or more short articles in lieu of one
long one. At the beginning of each
class we will divide up the readings for presentation. Everyone will read at least one specific
reading. I want to limit the number of
readings covered each class to keep the reading reasonable and to allow enough
time for discussion.
The in-class format may vary with the material. Typically, I
will lecture during the first part. In
the later, seminar, portion of each class we will begin by discussing the
general reading. Each of the specific
readings will be presented by a student in the course and opened for
discussion.
I will try to choose general readings that are available
on-line. If the best material is not
available on-line, I will place a copy of the general reading in the
secretary's office on the 3rd floor of the Psychology Building the week before
each class. You will be responsible for
locating the individual readings. I can
probably help if you have a problem-- but only if you try to locate the article
well in advance of the class. I will
try to bring copies of most of the individual readings to my office the week
before class. I will typically bring
them home early in the week before each class so that I can re-read them. I suggest that you try to secure the class
materials early-- even if you will not read them until the night before class.
I suggest that, prior to each class, by 1:00 P.M. on the day of
class, each student would turn in a set of reactions and/or questions
concerning the textbook readings and/or core reading, and specific reading
assigned. This would help ensure that
all read the material and provide some basis for discussion. Any handouts
related to the individual readings would be welcome. These can be turned in to my mailbox in the Psychology building
or to me in my office.
Readings
The Alcock book is a very popular, general textbook in animal
behavior. Written by a zoologist,
rather than a psychologist, there are some areas that are emphasized more or less
than I would like for our purposes. I
will skip a few chapters and cover some topics not included in the book.
Hauser presents a fairly balanced position regarding cognitive
ethology and consciousness as compared to others in the field. Animal cognition is an important part of
comparative psychology today. We will
also be able to revisit some of the topics covered earlier in the course from
his perspective and to discuss his views.
I will try to find a good general reading each week and to add appropriate
individual readings.
Preparations and Grading
The following is subject to negotiation. I would like to treat this as a mature,
graduate-level seminar as much as possible.
Grades would be determined primarily by written material, class attendance,
presentations, and class participation.
In the past I have found that, on some occasions, as the crunch
develops late in the semester, the reading assignments are not always
completed. This is fatal in a class
with a heavy component of discussion.
If this happens, I reserve the right to institute some means of checking
that the reading is done, such as quizzes or summaries of the readings. I prefer not to have to do this.
Topics to be covered
The list of topics to be covered can be seen on page 1 of this
syllabus. It would be awkward, but I
may be willing to alter this to a limited degree if there is general sentiment
for a revision. I have tried to provide
a broad treatment of issues in comparative psychology but it is impossible to
be complete in the number of classes available. Among the topics I have had to exclude are feeding and predation,
applied animal behavior,, individual behavioral patterns (e.g., sleep,
biorhythms), methods of study, comparative psychology of humans, and physiological
bases of behavior. Rather than have a
whole session on humans, I will try to work material on humans into as many
classes as possible.
Locating me
My
office is 357 Psychology. My telephone
number is 392-0601 x279 and I frequently check e-mail (dewsbury@ufl.edu). I am on campus for at least part of most
days, but I will try to keep Monday and Thursday 1:15-2:15 as formal office
hours. Changes will be announced in class. _________________________________________________________________
READING ASSIGNMENTS
(As developed thus far)
Here I provide a list of readings for the first class and the
textbook readings for the semester.
Class 02: History of
Comparative Psychology
Core Readings
Alcock Chapter 1
Dewsbury, D. A. (1989). A
brief history of the study of animal behavior in North America. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer
(Eds.) Perspectives in ethology Vol. 8. (pp. 85-122). New York: Plenum.
Individual Readings
Comparative Psychology
1. Dewsbury, D. A. (1992). Triumph and tribulation in the
history of American comparative psychology. Journal of Comparative
Psychology, 106, 3-19.
2. Watson, J. B. (1912). Instinctive activity in animals. Harper's
Magazine, 124, 376-382.
3. Lashley, K. S. (1938). Experimental analysis of instinctive
behavior. Psychological Review, 45, 445-471.
4. Beach, F. A. (1950).
The snark was a boojum. American Psychologist, 5, 115-124.
5. Lockard, R. B. (1971). Reflections on the fall of comparative
psychology: Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 26,
168-179.
Ethology
6. Hess, E. H. (1962). Ethology: An approach toward the complete
analysis of behavior. In R. Brown, E. Galanter, E. H. Hess, and G. Mandler. New
directions in psychology v. 1 (pp. 159-199 only). New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston.
7. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift
für Tierpsychology, 20, 410-433.
8. Lehrman, D. S. (1953). A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory
of instinctive behavior. Quarterly
Review of Biology, 28, 337-363.
Interactions
9. Dewsbury, D. A. (1992). Comparative psychology and ethology:
A reassessment. American Psychologist, 47, 208-215.
Summary of Textbook Reading
Assignments
|
Class |
Date |
Topic |
Chapter |
|
|
|
|
|
Alcock |
Hauser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Aug. 26 |
Organization |
|
|
|
2 |
Sep. 02 |
History |
1 |
|
|
3 |
Sep. 09 |
Evolution |
2 |
|
|
4 |
Sep. 16 |
Behavior Genetics |
3 |
|
|
5 |
Sep. 23 |
Development |
4 |
|
|
6 |
Sep. 30 |
Learning |
|
|
|
7 |
Oct. 07 |
Individual behavior |
7,8 |
|
|
8 |
Oct. 14 |
Reproductive behavior |
11 |
|
|
9 |
Oct. 21 |
Social behavior |
14 |
|
|
10 |
Oct. 28 |
Communication |
10 |
|
|
11 |
Nov. 04 |
Cognition I: Language
&Recognition |
|
1,5, 8 |
|
X |
Nov. 11 |
VETERAN'S DAY |
|
|
|
12 |
Nov. 18 |
Cognition II: Problem
Solving |
|
2,3,4,6, |
|
X |
Nov. 25 |
THANKSGIVING |
|
|
|
13 |
Dec. 02 |
Cognition III:
Mind;Animals & Humans |
15 |
7, 9,10 |